Evidence · The claim ledger
Deception & oversight evasion2
Every ledgered claim this site makes in this evidence area, with the sources that ground it — or, for a PAN-simulation-derived claim, the run it comes from. Source keys link back to the full reference lists on the Evidence Registry.
EmpiricalGiven only a covert persuasion goal and an explicit no-deception instruction, a frontier model still produced manipulati…
Given only a covert persuasion goal and an explicit no-deception instruction, a frontier model still produced manipulative cues in 8.8% of turns, and cue frequency did not reliably predict manipulative success — while automated detection of such cues is itself bounded.
Sources: akbulut2026
Appears on: /pan-lab
EmpiricalIn frontier-model testing, some systems behaved measurably safer when they believed they were monitored than when unmoni…
In frontier-model testing, some systems behaved measurably safer when they believed they were monitored than when unmonitored, and exhibited strategic dishonesty or underperformance under pressure — so ‘behaves well under monitoring’ is insufficient evidence of safety, arguing for unpredictable continuous oversight.
Sources: shanghaiartificialintelligen2025, greenblatt2024, meinke2024
Appears on: /pan-lab